Reality Check India

Parliamentary Committee Report

Posted in Uncategorized by realitycheck on January 5, 2007


Yo bloggers ! Break free of MSM.

You can now read the parliamentary committee reports directly at the PRS India website. They are available here

So, I checked out the Parliamentary Committee Report on OBC quotas presented to the HRD Ministry. The report is available at

I read the entire report, what was striking was

  • the open acknowledgement of lack of data
  • the full knowledge of the regional imbalances (especially TN)
  • the knowledge that creamy layers will deprive the really needy
  • the knowledge that no OBC caste has been excluded
  • the knowledge the muslims in the north/east were being shortchanged
  • the fact that 22.4% of the countrys urban OBCs live in TN
  • the unfulfilled demands for caste census (not just the omnibus OBC group as some dravidians want, but individual castes) by state governments

The clincher

The Committee was also given to understand that there had been a long pending and consistent demand from some State Governments/ State Backward Class Commissions for undertaking a comprehensive census survey of Backward Classes. It was emphasized that if this task was not accomplished, such affirmative action as extending reservations would not have legitimate and just basis.

Source Para 25 of the Report 186 here

What does this mean ? This task (caste census) has not been accomplished at this time, does this mean the committee is accepting that “such affirmative action” does not have a legitimate and just basis.

By not excluding the creamy layer, the politicians have to answer to the poor families who are still laying tar. Are these policies not for them ?


OBC Quota – end of legislative process

Posted in Uncategorized by realitycheck on January 5, 2007


The president APJ Abdul Kalam today signed the OBC Quota bill. This marks the end of the legislative process. The ball is now in the hands of the public and the judiciary to protect the interests of the weaker sections and the right to equality of a large chunk of Indians.

This blog has never idolized anyone – however fashionable it may be. Whether it is Narayan Murthy or Abdul Kalam, we must only judge men by their actions.

Look at what the President said on May 5th 2006

What are the benefits of reservations in places like IITs (Indian Institute of Technology) and IIMs (Indian Institute of Management), how has it helped the society since its introduction more than 58 years ago – these and other questions must be answered after a detailed study before new reservations are imposed

Kalam prefers studies conducted before new reservation policies – Patna Daily

Seven months later, he finds a bill on his table. No studies have been conducted, no data has been presented about the backwardness of castes in the OBC list, and even the creamy layer has not been excluded. Should nt he have atleast sent it back for reconsideration like the “Office for Profit Bill” ? He could have asked why the creamy layers were included – he has no caste based political constituency to worry about.

Research staff for MPs, a unique group

Posted in Uncategorized by realitycheck on January 4, 2007


I found out about a unique group called “PRS Legislative Research“.  This is an independent group dedicated to making parliamentarians better informed, therefore deepening the quality of debates in the process of law making. Website 

Among the things they do:

PRS produces easy to understand 4-6 pages long Legislative Briefs on a range of Bills. These Briefs are sent to all MPs in both houses of Parliament, about 1200 NGOs across the country, and the top 500 companies. We also email our Briefs to more than 600 people in the media.

PRS Legislative Research is incubated by the Centre for Policy Research.

I found out about this group via an article by its Director C.V.Madhukar that appeared in the Indian Express on Jan 3 , 2007. The article talks about the lack of debate and the “voice vote” culture. Even such monumental bills having deep social impact such as the OBC Quota bill were passed with almost no debate.  Article source

Being an effective Lok Sabha MP can mean very hard work. To make things more difficult, MPs do not have budgets available to hire good research staff. The Parliament library offers an important service by providing, at fairly short notice, clippings of recent newspaper articles to MPs on request. But it is left to the MP to sift through the many clippings and distil his or her arguments. What is even more worrisome is that the world’s largest democracy seems to expect MPs to decide on national policy based on newspaper reports.

A brilliant observation. The newspapers (read main stream media) influence over law making must be reduced. Debates must be conducted on the basis of available facts. Sometimes these facts are not easy to obtain or analyze. As Mr Madhukar says, all steps must be taken to increase budgetary support to each MP to hire research staff. If you have seen US political TV shows like “The West Wing” – you will know what I am talking about.  We need our share of ambitious and young research assisstants too.

Most bills in Parliament are passed by a voice vote. So there is not even a record of whether a certain MP was present at the time of the passage of a bill. This seems to be an easy one to fix — the Parliament has the technology that allows MPs to push a button to vote on bills.

I am reading quite a bit these days. Very rarely do I come across an article that has me nodding in agreement throughout.

They are looking for public participation in their efforts. I will be emailing them shortly to see if there can be an exchange of ideas between the blogger community and this organization.

PRS is also making significant efforts to reach out to the citizen sector, the corporate sector and the Press

Good work guys.


If you have any comment about upcoming bills, you can post a comment on their website

I think this is one of the very few ways the general public can communicate with law makers in India.

2006 – When our interests were narrowed

Posted in Uncategorized by realitycheck on January 2, 2007

Future generations will look at the year 2006 as a turning point in the history of India.  The OBC reservation policy, as Nani Palkhiwala points out, is the “paramount constitutional issue” today. Everything else, whether it is the economy or foreign policy or taxation, comes later.  This was the year the interests of Indians were narrowed even further on the basis of caste.

Two bit politicians talked freely about amending the constitution as if it were just a procedural formality. The poor and really depressed were the target of bait-and-switch tactics by politicians and left wingers of all hues. They were used as poster-boys for creating policies that really had no impact on them. The “demo version” showed poor and oppressed people, but the actual law showed creamy layers.

The most important takeway from 2006 was the absolute disregard for social data while framing policies. Top rung ministers pooh-poohed even the basic requirement for a community to establish backwardness in a scientific way. When data came out of unexpected sources, the anomalies were striking. These anomalies would be sufficient to start a revolution in any other country, but we Indians are patient.

On that note, Happy New Year !!