Reality Check India

Indian flag should be hoisted at Lal Chowk

Posted in Uncategorized by realitycheck on January 25, 2011

Happy Republic Day !

I want the Indian flag to be hoisted in Lal Chowk.

Here are some of the arguments  I saw on TV today made by Congress & assorted seculars.

Subhashini Ali (CON) : Why do people from one part of the country go to another part to hoist a flag ? Why cant they do in their own states ?

Reality Check (non CON) : Kinda stupid, but since you asked. Most of the people in the rally are from Jammu & Kashmir state. Happy ?

Madhu Kishwar(might CON anytime) : Where was the BJP when 100 people were killed last year ?

First we need to recognize this trick of the seculars.

Trick : Attribute any issue against the establishment to the BJP.

Effect : Will confuse the public and sow doubts in their mind about their own personal stand

Example : BJP is making a big noise over 2G scam. Well, I know muslims who are outraged over the scam too. But since  you bring in the BJP you can expect all but the most sharp ones to back off. In reality, Indians are outraged over the scam. BJP just happens to be aligned with those Indians on this issue.

Back to Madhu Kishwar,

What she is saying is : Because the BJP did not intervene when 100 muslims living in Kashmir valley were killed,  India loses its right to hoist its flag on Lal Chowk. This is absurd. So Madhu, when does this sanction expire ? Is the hoisting of the national flag conditional on someone having behaved in a certain way.

Madhu Kishwar:  Patriotism is not about territory – it is about people

Okay – we get it.  Couched in sweet emotional talk like “BJP should talk to Kashmiris and win their hearts”  is the underlying reality that once you succumb to this compromise – you have no choice but to yield to the next step. Which is trade territory for peace of Indian Kashmiri Muslims. That would be the “people patriotism” – if they are not happy, what use is holding on to the valley. Territorial patriotism is nothing but jingoism – she says.

She makes it seem like it is a one way street in Kashmir. TWO decades have passed since the Hindu minority were thrown out of their homes. It is easy to turn around her question : Where was Madhu Kishwar when that happened ? But that is juvenile so we dont do that.  It is a religious issue – a few Islamists have held the state to ransom – no one believes they have the military power to challenge anyone hoisting the flag in Lal Chowk. So this over reaction from the Central Government is clearly something very suspicious.

This took the cake  :

A gentleman gets agitated at Arnab and says this :

Arnaub – Before the program we were told to air our views but not to politicize it. Now why is everyone doing it.

  1. To me it is shocking that guests are prepped before the program not to politicize it.
  2. Not one of the guests named the CONGRESS PARTY by name. On the other hand, there was not one sentence that did not have BJP in it.
  3. It seems to me that all guests lived up to their pre-debate deal. Congress was referred to in many ways as the ruling party, party in power at centre, etc.
  4. The CON members completely ignored the deal and launched frontal attacks on the BJP (Subhashini Ali said BJP should find out Asseemanands in its ranks instead of hoisting the national flag).
  5. Arnaub did not check the CON men/women from breaking the deal, which by itself is shocking (see 1)


Do not politicize XYZ =  does not apply to CON.


9 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ramesh Chand Arigapu, Reality Check India. Reality Check India said: Blogged (ignore typos too tired now) […]

  2. Dinesh Chanchalani said, on January 25, 2011 at 7:44 pm

    Madhu Kishwar actually used the word “butchered” to describe the killings of criminals pelting stones at armed forces trying to maintain law and order.

  3. Dinesh Chanchalani said, on January 25, 2011 at 8:01 pm

    As an aside, after watching the Times Now show, I thought Madhu Kishwar did run down Omar Abdullah and his government pretty bad too …

  4. Sushant jain said, on January 25, 2011 at 9:22 pm

    Lagta hai desh me emergency aa gai hai…

  5. seadog4227 said, on January 29, 2011 at 9:54 am

    From the Webster Online Dictionary:
    Meaning of the word ” Congress”:
    a : the act or action of coming together and meeting
    b : coitus (physical union of male and female genitalia accompanied by rhythmic movements : sexual intercourse)
    The congress is a group of people who gather to screw the country.

  6. Sanjeev Sabhlok said, on February 13, 2011 at 11:20 pm

    Wasn’t aware that good friend Madhu Kishwar was against the hoisting of national flag on 26 January. Very disappointing. What is her theory of the state, then? I’m afraid she does not sound quite as classical liberal as I thought she was.


  7. Sanjeev Sabhlok said, on February 13, 2011 at 11:22 pm

    Can you pl. subscribe me to your blog? Thanks!

  8. seadog4227 said, on March 8, 2011 at 3:01 am

    Sanyaas le liye kya?

    Where art thou?

  9. realitycheck said, on March 20, 2011 at 4:07 am

    Still here – twitter is to blame.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: